I suppose its better to get battered on a comfy seat than an uncomfy one! Mind you, then you would think a bed chair would be better!
As you say, I think clever advertising by manufacturers has a lot to do with it Campo. I for one was fooled into buying a top of the range pole and box much before I was ready for one. When I think back, I spent a summer working for a builder three days a week labouring, and at a restaurant four nights a week pot washing/ waiting on so I could afford to by my G995/ Milo box three years ago. In hindsight, the money would have been much better spent entering matches and building up experience.
You see a lot of young anglers on the bank with top of the range poles/boxes and unfortunately the tag ' all the gear no idea' fits quite well, and I feel the same could have been said of me.
What strikes me with the REALLY GOOD young anglers, take 'three times' for example, is that they are out on the bank a lot. I rang Matt the day after he got back from the world champs and he was pleasure fishing on the Chessy canal, he went barbel fishing on the rother yesterday, is pleasuring at kiveton waters today and fishing a knockup I am running at Charnock tonight. While he has got all the gear, he has got something far more valuable- hours of experience on the bank, and this is worth more than any pole or box you can buy.
That said, I can see why people do spend a lot of money on gear they may not be 'ready' for. If you draw next to a top angler with a £2000 pole and you only have a £1000 pole and it is fishing long up to an island for example, you are disadvantaged straight away, both in terms of equipment and confidence, so if you can afford to have a top of the range pole then there is an argument for having one. If having a top of the range pole means you can' t afford to fish as much, I would definitely go fishing as oppose to buying what you can't afford!
|